For the pictures I took of the Colorado College Criterium, I used a different software tool to create the gallery. This makes three different ways I have pictures on my website.
For a while I was using a JavaScript slide show and I’d also create a separate page so all the pictures could be scanned quickly. Some of the pictures I did this way were my 2006 Eiseman Hut Ski Trip and 2006 Texas Hell Week.
After that I went to using the Copermine Photo Gallery. Pictures that I published that way included the 2006 Leadville 100 Mountain Bike Race and the 2006 Pikes Peak Velo SuperCross cyclocross race.
Which of these three ways do you like best for looking at pictures? I have my opinions both from the way to look at the pictures and how easy it is to add the pictures and caption them. I’m not going to share my opinions now because I don’t want to influence what you think. Please post a comment or send me an e-mail and let me know your thoughts. You can also give me your opinion on the layout of my web pages and blog template. I think my blog template is really ugly. I plan to change it but I never seem to find the time to work on it.
Tags: cycling, mountain biking, pictures, skiing
Blog RSS Feed
Like on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Flickr
Contact
I like the JavaScript slideshow w/ separate page option better. The Coppermine solution is nice (nice, polished look), but the page has to reload every time you click through to the next picture, which is kind of annoying.
[…] busy going through all the photos I took at the 24 Hours of Moab. I know I’ve already used a few different ways to display photos. I’ve now set up a customized SmugMug account. So far I’m really excited about the way […]